Skip Navigation



Music and Letters Advance Access published online on December 16, 2005
Music and Letters, doi:10.1093/ml/gci177
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
87/1/52    most recent
gci177v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baragwanath, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Article

Musicology and Critical Theory: The Case of Wagner, Adorno, and Horkheimer

Nicholas Baragwanath *

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nicholas Baragwanath, E-mail: Nicholas.Baragwanath{at}rncm.ac.uk


  Abstract

Adorno’s Versuch über Wagner (1938/1952) is unquestionably a significant musicological work, yet the discipline has sought mostly to neutralize, even while registering, its impact. The essential and acknowledged influence of Max Horkheimer’s study of bourgeois anthropological ideology upon Adorno’s monograph is outlined in order to construct a context for its understanding and use within musicology. More broadly, the question is raised whether this collision of ideas originating with the ‘Frankfurt School’ offers a workable model for reading, into music, a coded reflection of sociological meaning. To conclude, a suggestion is put forward as to how the Versuch might be used as a basis for ongoing research: will history judge Wagner’s achievement to be the source of so-called ‘new music’, or merely an extravagant symptom of the decline of the old?


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.